Submissions closed. Framework starts 21 Jan 2027.

CWAS3 Lot 1 Planning Consultancy Application Support

Glaxtons helps planning consultancies secure placement on the CCS CWAS3 framework. We write the methodology responses, structure the case study evidence, and complete the pricing matrices that win framework places.

How Planning Consultancies Access CWAS3 Lot 1

CWAS3 Lot 1 covers Construction Works for General Projects. It delivers general construction works including new build, refurbishment, extensions, alterations, maintenance, and minor associated civil engineering works. The lot is structured across six project value bands from under £5 million through to over £250 million, with twelve regional geographies for the under-£5m band. It is the largest lot within the CWAS3 framework with 29 sub-lots.

Planning consultancy services are delivered as associated services within construction projects procured through Lot 1. When a public sector body commissions a construction project through the framework, planning services including spatial planning, development management, environmental impact assessment, and community consultation form part of the project delivery team. This means planning consultancies can access a continuous pipeline of public sector work by being part of the supply chain for Lot 1 appointed contractors and through direct engagement on framework call-offs that require planning expertise.

For planning consultancies, the commercial opportunity is significant. Lot 1 provides access to construction projects across central government, NHS trusts, local authorities, universities, and arm's length bodies. Every project requiring planning input represents a potential commission for placed firms and their supply chain partners.

Evidence Requirements for Planning Firms

CWAS3 quality responses require structured evidence of your planning capability. RTPI membership and Chartered Town Planner status are strong signals of professional competence that evaluators recognise. However, accreditation alone does not score marks. You must demonstrate how your planning expertise translates into measurable project outcomes through detailed methodology responses and evidenced case studies.

The quality questions within the CWAS3 ITT assess your supply chain management approach (SC&QM1), your continuous improvement and collaboration methodology (CI&CA1), your construction life cycle understanding (CL1), and your resilience in delivery (RD1). Planning consultancies must address each question with specific examples drawn from comparable project experience. Generic statements about planning expertise will not achieve competitive scores.

RTPI membership and Chartered status as professional evidence
Spatial planning methodology aligned to NPPF and local plan requirements
Environmental impact assessment experience at comparable scale
Community consultation and stakeholder engagement track record
Development management expertise with local planning authority liaison
Social value delivery through planning and community outcomes
Quality management systems aligned to ISO 9001 standards
Case studies demonstrating measurable planning outcomes

Writing Methodology Responses for Planning Services

The methodology response is where most planning consultancies lose marks. Evaluators are not looking for a description of what planning is. They are looking for a structured, evidence-based explanation of how you will deliver planning services within the specific context of the framework, how you manage quality, how you handle programme changes, and how you ensure continuous improvement across projects.

Glaxtons writes methodology responses that directly address the CCS scoring criteria. Every paragraph is structured to score against the published marking scheme. We use your firm's actual project experience, team capabilities, and technical approach to build responses that are both authentic and optimised for maximum evaluation scores. Our team has reviewed the complete CWAS3 quality questionnaire and understands exactly what each sub-criterion requires.

Case Study Format and Structure

Case studies within CWAS3 must demonstrate comparable project delivery at a scale relevant to your target sub-lots. For planning consultancies, this means evidencing projects where your planning input directly contributed to successful project outcomes. Each case study should clearly articulate the challenge, your approach, the planning outputs delivered, and the measurable results achieved.

Glaxtons structures case studies to align with evaluator expectations. We identify the strongest examples from your project portfolio, extract the key evidence points, and present them in the format that CCS evaluators are trained to assess. We ensure every case study includes quantifiable outcomes, not just descriptions of activity.

Pricing

CWAS3 Planning Consultancy Application

From £10,000

Complete application management including methodology writing, case study structuring, pricing matrix completion, and portal submission. Fixed price with no hidden costs.

View full CWAS3 service details

Plan Your CWAS3 Route

CWAS3 submissions closed on 21 May 2026; the framework commences 21 January 2027. Register your interest for the next CWAS3 intake, or ask Glaxtons about call-off bids and subcontracting routes onto the framework for your planning consultancy. Call 020 3668 5488.

Professional Bid Writing Services UK. 93% Success Rate.

Expert bid consultancy and tender writing for government, NHS and CCS frameworks. £500M+ contracts won. Same-day response. 24/7 urgent support.

Get a Free Quote. Same Day Response. ☎ 020 3668 5488
✓ 93% Success Rate ✓ £500M+ Won ✓ 500+ Tenders ✓ 2-Hour Response

Recent Wins

✓ Won £45M NHS FM contract for healthcare provider

✓ Secured £12M MoD framework for defence SME

✓ Won £8M G-Cloud lot for SaaS company